BAP – presentation v2


Another draft!

My presentation will focus upon criteria G Faith show an ability to reflect critically on their faith and make connections between faith and contemporary life.

In my presentation I would like to discuss ways for connecting worship with everyday life through creative worship.

I consider that worship is about being with God and about being prepared to go out to work in the world.  It is a time of adoration and also transformation as we commune with God. Either consciously or unconsciously worship changes us as God’s spirit speaks to our spirit.

Yet, is our worship always meaningful and relative to our everyday lives?  Should worship make connections with the so called mundane world?

Actions speak louder than words and regular services already involve the participation of the congregation through being asked to stand, sit or kneel through to even shaking hands.  Actions matter and have a profound effect.  The central focus of our worship is Holy Communion, the ultimate point of interaction where the reality of God becomes powerfully present. In turn, this act of remembrance becomes the initiator of further action as we go out into the world.

I have used various interactive, sensory and creative activities during an informal service I have led over the past year.  These activities ranged from writing prayers, projected images, lighting candles, reading pre-set prayers, led meditation, music, making paper aeroplanes to just being silent in front of smouldering incense.

In Matthew 22.37 Jesus said, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with your entire mind.”  I believe this commandment can be explored through using a range of interactive creative stimulus.  Creative worship allows people with different learning styles to engage with worship in ways that makes sense to them by being enabled to relate worship to their everyday experiences.

Fleming’s VAK model is widely used to categorize various types of learner which I believe can be related to worshippers.   For instance, kinaesthetic learners prefer to learn by doing and so would enjoy more physically interactive events such as writing prayers or lighting candles.  Whereas visual learners prefer visual aids such as drawing, projected images and hand-outs.  Auditory learners benefit most through listening and so would gain much from led meditations, talks or group discussions.

However, it is important to bear in mind that this exciting, liberative, creative form of worship may distress those who enjoy the read-response liturgical nature of C of E worship.  They may feel uncomfortable with any deviation from the book-bound culture they are familiar with.  Therefore a degree of sensitivity is required when organizing worship.

To conclude, my vision for connecting faith and contemporary life is through the use of creative sensory activities in worship that correlates with styles of learning.  I believe such worship can support the deepening of our relationship and growth as Disciples of Christ.

Advertisements

2 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. Simon Martin (@mwalimurural)
    Jan 17, 2012 @ 23:09:48

    Hi, Emma.
    I can understand why you have chosen to go with this as the theme for your BAP presentation. It is something that you are clearly passionate about … and of which you have wide experience. So well chosen.
    I’ve read the 1st draft you posted, and Claire’s comments.
    Can I just make three small points?
    (1) I am familiar with the VARK model (Visual-auditory-reading/written-kinaesthetic) – which actually seems to be what you are alluding to, especially as a considerable part of book-oriented culture focuses on the written/read word.
    (2) I assume that you are familiar with the whole concept of sensory prayer; but an excellent example of the wholistic and fully-rounded approach to worship can be found in “Sense Making Faith” of which more at http://www.spiritualjourneys.org.uk/.
    (3) I feel the questions for consideration that you included at the end of the 1st draft have real value in themselves, but also for guiding discussion at the time of your presentation itself. I would still include them.
    Go for it!
    Every blessing, Simon

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: